andrew wiles

• http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/proof/wiles.html
  
  buradaki roportajinda cok salak sorulara cevap vermek zorunda kalmistir kendisi:
  
  nova: so fermat said because he could not find any solutions to this equation, then there were no solutions?
  
  aw: he did more than that. just because we can't find a solution it doesn't mean that there isn't one. mathematicians aren't satisfied because they know there are no solutions up to four million or four billion, they really want to know that there are no solutions up to infinity. and to do that we need a proof. fermat said he had a proof. unfortunately, all he ever wrote down was: "i have a truly marvelous demonstration of this proposition which this margin is too narrow to contain."
  
  nova: what do you mean by a proof?
  
  aw: in a mathematical proof you have a line of reasoning consisting of many, many steps, that are almost self-evident. if the proof we write down is really rigorous, then nobody can ever prove it wrong. there are proofs that date back to the greeks that are still valid today.
  
  sen git fermat'in teoremini ispatla, adam sana ispat demek ne demek diye sorsun roportajda. direk bi siktir git'lik bir soru ama andrew amca yine de cevaplamis guzelce.
  
  diger sorular fena degil bu arada.